Facebook, Google and Twitter Where are you going? Did you cross all the standards? Is it the madness of money, or is it the original, meaning stupidity?

  Facebook, Google and Twitter Where are you going? Did you cross all the standards? Is it the madness of money, or is it the original, meaning stupidity?

                                                                                                                                                                The world's largest social network has over 2 billion daily users and is growing rapidly around the world. Led by CEO Mark Zuckerberg and its CEO, Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook has undergone much of a tendency.  A. Global conversation online, in Los Angeles both thru its flagship software and its affiliates Instagram, WhatsApp and Oculus. Despite huge financial success, Facebook is also facing questions about the. A. Data privacy, hate speech on the platform and fear that frequent use of social media could lead to unhappiness.A platform made for los angeles verbal social exchange for the sake of family reunification, friendship, respectful acquaintance, social service, authorized help and humanitarian service, but unfortunately it has become a den of gangs, criminal propaganda, fraud and false propaganda, as it has become a den of gangs, It has become a coincidence for our children who are the most SUBSCRIBE, this platform, a risk for humanity, more dangerous than the Corona epidemic. Executives of Facebook, Google and Twitter are heard on March 25 by a panel in the Los Angeles US House of Representatives about disinformation plaguing online platforms, representatives announced Thursday, March 25. Opening statements from Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai and Jack Dorsey were released ahead of Thursday's disinformation target market. A. Chamber - and they show that the three CEOs are tackling an unusually practical query for technology platforms. All three statements are worth reading, with Dorsey focusing on internal tools like Birdwatch and Pichai, warning of the risks of a complete repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

But the proposition l. A. More detail came from Zuckerberg, who spoke at length about his favorite changes to Section 230. Instead of completely repealing Los Angeles law - as President Biden called for during campaigns - Zuckerberg's Los Angeles proposal make section 230 conditional on companies maintaining a system to remove illegal content.

 

We believe Congress should consider making platform intermediaries responsible for certain kinds of illegal content subject to the. A. Ability of companies to follow best practices to combat l. A. Dissemination of this content. Instead of benefiting from immunity, platforms should be required to demonstrate that they have systems in place to identify and remove illegal content. Platforms should not be held responsible if a particular piece of content escapes detection - which would be impractical for platforms with billions of posts per day - but they should be required to have systems adequate to fight against illegal content.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which was passed in 1996, says that an "interactive computer carrier" cannot be treated as the publisher or speaker of content level. This protects web sites from legal action if a user posts something illegal, although there are exceptions for pirated material related to prostitution.

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Representative Chris Cox (R-CA) designed Phase 230 so that website owners can moderate websites without worrying about legal liability. The law is especially vital for social media, but it covers many sites and offerings, including news outlets with comment sections - like. The Electronic Frontier Foundation calls it the most important law protecting l. A. Speech on the Internet.

However, it is increasingly controversial and often misinterpreted. Critics say its broad protections allow powerful companies to ignore the real damage to users. On the flip side, some lawmakers mistakenly claim that it only protects "neutral platforms" - a term unrelated to Los Angeles law.

Retention standards for 230 protections could be set by a third party, Zuckerberg continues, and would exclude encryption and privacy claims "that deserve a full-component hearing." This sets Los Angeles Zuckerberg's proposal apart from 230 previously introduced bills like the EARN IT Act, which conditions protections on a much-sought-after encryption backdoor. Zuckerberg's proposal is closer to the PACT law, which conditions protections on transparency disclosures and other measures, but focuses less on l. A. Removal of Illegal Content.

Overall, it is unusual for companies to offer rules on l. A. How they would like to be regulated, but that's less unusual for Zuckerberg, who has already written at length about favorable rules for data portability and content moderation.

This is proposition l. A. More detailed for Section 230 that Zuckerberg has put forward yet, and it's a proposal that would require few material changes for Facebook itself. Facebook already maintains important systems for identifying and removing illegal or otherwise objectionable content. Nevertheless, l. A. Proposal could address some of the more pressing objections to section 230, which often focuses on smaller web sites entirely dedicated to malicious activity.

The problem is particularly pressing for groups like the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which struggle with websites that do not digitize or moderate images of child abuse.

“There are a lot of companies, especially some of the very large companies, that are engaging in some really great voluntary measures,” NCMEC's ​​Yiota Souras said earlier this year. “But there are a lot of companies that don't, and there is no legal duty for them to use any kind of detection or screening.

 

Congress asked the three buyer's to answer yes or no to a series of complex and detailed questions. Lawmakers sometimes interrupted CEOs when they tried to give longer answers. During the hearing, Jack Dorsey mocked the tactic by tweeting a poll that was simply a question mark, asking Twitter users to vote yes or no Two House subcommittees will hold a full hearing will be attended by Facebook consumer Mark Zuckerberg, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Twitter chairman Jack Dorsey, as the US Congress studies the possibility of changing the legal inclinations protecting social networks.       

    cite de lutilisatteur pour expllquer ICI                                                                                                                              (archives -Wikipédia-Internet-Google)                                                                                               DERCTED BY DJEDAINI AHMED